Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| classes_of_publication [2026/09/29 18:23] – Add sourced introduction and related-text links andy | classes_of_publication [2026/10/03 19:11] (current) – Develop article with quotations verified against local books, source attribution and contextual analysis. andy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ====== The A∴A∴ Classes of Publication ====== | ====== The A∴A∴ Classes of Publication ====== | ||
| - | Crowley’s publication | + | <WRAP right 260px> |
| + | {{: | ||
| - | ===== The classes ===== | + | //The definitions of Classes A–D and the beginning of the Class A list, The Equinox I:10 (1913), p. 43.// [[https:// |
| - | ^ Class ^ Function in the publication system ^ | + | </ |
| - | | A | Writings whose wording is treated as inviolable within | + | |
| - | | B | Works of study or scholarship. | | + | |
| - | | C | Suggestive material, inviting reflection. | | + | |
| - | | D | Official rituals | + | |
| - | | E | Public | + | |
| - | The 1913 syllabus describes four classes, | + | The **A∴A∴ classes of publication** identify the authority and intended use assigned to different kinds of writing |
| - | ===== Why the distinction matters ===== | + | The [[aa_syllabus|syllabus]] in //The Equinox// I:10 (1913) explicitly defines four classes, A–D. Class E is separately attested by the printed classification of [[liber_ii|Liber II]] in //The Equinox// III:1 (1919). The familiar five-class table consequently brings together evidence from more than one publication; it should |
| - | The distinction helps separate | + | |
| - | ===== Sources | + | ===== The five classes |
| - | * [[https:// | + | |
| - | * [[https:// | + | ^ Class ^ Function ^ Examples and qualifications ^ |
| + | | A | Writings whose wording and style are treated as inviolable within the system. | [[liber_lxv|Liber LXV]], [[liber_vii|Liber VII]] and [[liber_trigrammaton|Liber Trigrammaton]]. | | ||
| + | | B | Books and essays produced through enlightened and earnest ordinary scholarship. | [[liber_e|Liber E]], [[liber_o|Liber O]] and [[liber_777|777]]; | ||
| + | | C | Material offered primarily as suggestive. | [[the_book_of_lies|The Book of Lies]], with specified exceptions, and [[john_st_john|John St. John]]. | | ||
| + | | D | Official rituals and instructions. | [[liber_graduum|Liber XIII]], [[liber_resh|Liber Resh]] and [[liber_astarte|Liber Astarte]]. | | ||
| + | | E | Public exposition or proclamation of the Law. | [[liber_ii|The Message of the Master Therion]], whose 1919 classification leaf explicitly reads Class E. | | ||
| + | |||
| + | The examples in the first four rows follow the 1913 syllabus. Their inclusion records the source' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Class A: preservation and internal authority ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The definition of Class A treats the utterance as beyond correction even by the visible head of the organisation. Its practical editorial consequence is preservation: | ||
| + | |||
| + | This status is internal to the system described by the syllabus. Reporting that a work is Class A does not independently demonstrate a supernatural source, prove every historical claim associated with it, or establish the attainment of a person quoting it. Those are different questions requiring their own evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The distinction is useful on a reference wiki. An article may explain [[liber_cheth|Liber Cheth]] or [[liber_ararita|Liber Ararita]] in contemporary prose while clearly separating that explanation from the underlying text. The encyclopedia article does not inherit the original work's Class A status merely because it discusses it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Class B and Class D: a meaningful overlap ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is tempting to summarise B as theory and D as practice, but the syllabus does not support such a rigid division. Under Class B, it describes Liber E's record-keeping, | ||
| + | |||
| + | For Liber O, the syllabus gives a specific reason: its instructions are too loose to belong among Class D publications. The distinction therefore concerns the form and official standing of an instruction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[liber_graduum|Liber Graduum]] is a good example of the latter: it summarises tasks, examinations and transitions between grades. [[liber_israfel|Liber Israfel]], although plainly ceremonial in form, is listed in Class B. Assigning a class solely from a modern reader' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The 1913 explanation of //Liber O// is unusually candid: | ||
| + | |||
| + | > The instructions given in this book are too loose to find place in the Class D publications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | — Aleister Crowley, //A Syllabus of the Official Instructions of A∴A∴// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here the distinction concerns how tightly an instruction is specified. The entry still describes practical work, including elementary Qabalah and ritual methods. Consequently, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Class C: suggestion is not dismissal ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Class C includes poetry, allegory, philosophical writing and models for reflection. The 1913 list places //The Wake World//, //The Soldier and the Hunchback// and //John St. John// here. These examples show that “suggestive” is a description of how material is offered, not a declaration that it is unimportant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The syllabus calls John St. John a model for the analytical detail and fullness of a [[magical_record|magical record]]. It describes The Book of Lies as addressing matters of high importance and recommends it even to beginners. A Class C work may consequently serve a serious instructional purpose without requiring every sentence to be received in the same way as a Class A text.(([[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Composite works and local exceptions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP right 260px> | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //The syllabus explains mixed classifications and the special status of passages within a work, The Equinox I:10 (1913), p. 46.// [[https:// | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The opening definitions expressly allow publications to belong to more than one class. The subsequent entries demonstrate how carefully this needs to be applied. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[the_vision_and_the_voice|The Vision and the Voice]] appears under “Class A–B”. The syllabus then gives Class D status to the instruction in the Eighth Aethyr and to the method of invoking Aethyrs described in the Eighteenth. A general label for the volume does not erase these distinctions within it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Liber DCCCCLXIII is listed under Classes A and B, but the syllabus specifies that only its short note belongs to Class A. Likewise, the Class C entry for [[the_book_of_lies|The Book of Lies]] expressly assigns chapters XXV, XXXVI and XLIV to Class D: these are the Star Ruby, [[the_star_sapphire|Star Sapphire]] and [[mass_of_the_phoenix|Mass of the Phoenix]].(([[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | The sound editorial habit is to identify the passage being discussed and the scope of the classification attached to it. Applying one label indiscriminately to a collected volume, its introduction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The qualification is present in the initial definition of the scheme: | ||
| + | |||
| + | > Some publications are composite, and pertain to more than one class. | ||
| + | |||
| + | — Aleister Crowley, //A Syllabus of the Official Instructions | ||
| + | |||
| + | It authorises reading at more than one scale: a volume may have an overall designation while a note, vision or ritual within it has another. A catalogue can preserve both levels by recording the volume’s designation and the scope of any exception. This is especially useful when a later extract circulates on its own and no longer carries the surrounding explanation of its status. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Edition evidence and changing labels ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Classification should be checked against a dated source. [[liber_b|Liber B vel Magi]] illustrates why: its 1912 printing has a leaf reading Class B, while the 1913 syllabus lists it under Class A. These documents establish a difference in designation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The class must also be distinguished from the title and number. Liber B's letter is part of its title; Liber I is its numerical identifier. A number may encode a symbolic relationship, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources and related reading ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * Related articles: [[the_holy_books_of_thelema|the Holy Books]], [[aa_syllabus|the syllabus]] and [[one_star_in_sight|One Star in Sight]]. | ||